On May 14, 2023, an optical search for extraterrestrial intelligence recorded two extraordinary changes in the light of HD 89389, a star in Ursa Major. Their nearly identical structures remain unexplained. Artwork is a conceptual visualization, not a direct observation.

04 / Optical SETI / a foreground question

Two Pulses, One Unanswered Question

HD 89389’s light changed twice, 4.4 seconds apart. The striking resemblance is an observation to explain, while a nearby obstruction remains a hypothesis that additional measurements could test.

On May 14, 2023, Richard Stanton’s optical search recorded a bright–faint–bright disturbance in the light of HD 89389, followed by a closely resembling second disturbance. A telescope measures the light that reaches its detector. That record does not by itself locate the cause at the star, in intervening space, in Earth’s atmosphere or in the instrument. The article follows this distinction through an older observation of 51 Pegasi, a later event involving HD 12051, and a proposed way to measure the motion of a future disturbance across several observing positions.

The full investigation continues with the evidence, illustrations, and sources at The Last Transmission on Substack.

Continue reading on Substack

THE EVIDENCE / THE OPEN QUESTION

01 / THE OBSERVATION

What we know.

The 2025 journal paper reports the HD 89389 pair and a comparison with an earlier record. A subsequent conference paper discusses three paired events in different stars and proposes synchronized telescopes. The 4.4-second separation belongs to the two observed disturbances in HD 89389’s light; it is not a measured gravitational-lensing delay.

02 / THE UNKNOWN

What remains open.

No foreground object, transmitter or common cause has been identified. Occultation with diffraction and atmospheric alternatives remain interpretations to test, rather than discoveries established by the images. Similar structure within a record is not independent confirmation from a separate observatory.

03 / THE BIGGER PICTURE

Why it matters.

A synchronized array could look for a pattern sweeping across the ground and estimate its transverse motion under a specified geometry. That offers a testable next step while keeping the cause unresolved. Light Lab provides a separate, established example of light changing en route: gravitational lensing. Its model does not explain or reproduce these pulses.

FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

Research behind the field note.

Stanton (2025): Unexplained starlight pulses found in optical SETI searches — Acta Astronautica Stanton (2025): Telescope Arrays to Solve a Double Optical Pulse Mystery — SAS proceedings, pp. 79–84

VISUAL EVIDENCE

Inside the investigation.

Visual archive
On May 14, 2023, an optical search for extraterrestrial intelligence recorded two extraordinary changes in the light of HD 89389, a star in Ursa Major. Their nearly identical structures remain unexplained. Artwork is a conceptual visualization, not a direct observation.
On May 14, 2023, an optical search for extraterrestrial intelligence recorded two extraordinary changes in the light of HD 89389, a star in Ursa Major. Their nearly identical structures remain unexplained. Artwork is a conceptual visualization, not a direct observation.
From a privately operated observatory near Big Bear, California, Richard Stanton searched the light of more than 1,300 Sun-like stars for rapid optical anomalies. His high-speed measurements revealed a pattern that conventional long-exposure astronomical images might miss.
From a privately operated observatory near Big Bear, California, Richard Stanton searched the light of more than 1,300 Sun-like stars for rapid optical anomalies. His high-speed measurements revealed a pattern that conventional long-exposure astronomical images might miss.
Each recorded disturbance contained a rapid increase and decrease in brightness followed by a return toward normal starlight. The second pulse closely resembled the first despite occurring 4.4 seconds later. The accompanying artwork illustrates the phenomenon rather than reproducing the original scientific light curve.
Each recorded disturbance contained a rapid increase and decrease in brightness followed by a return toward normal starlight. The second pulse closely resembled the first despite occurring 4.4 seconds later. The accompanying artwork illustrates the phenomenon rather than reproducing the original scientific light curve.

FOLLOW THE THREAD

Related signals.

SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY / APPLIED HERE

Explore all twelve principles
04 Competing explanations

A similar pattern still needs a cause.

The paired disturbances constrain an explanation without identifying its location. Compare foreground diffraction, atmospheric effects and the observing system against the same timing record. The Light Lab replay illustrates a separate mechanism and adds no observational evidence for this event.

Ask yourself What else could produce this signal, and how could we distinguish the possibilities?

THE SIGNAL CONTINUES

Some discoveries stay with you.

Get the illustrated investigations delivered to your inbox. Then follow the questions that refuse to leave.

Subscribe on Substack